Mc101 headers
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:40 pm
I'm going to make a pair of 90 degree exhaust headers for my dual Mc101s / RLV blimp pipes.
My 3 main concerns are:
1. Size of the flex connection tubing.
2. Smoothness of the passageway all the way from the cylinder to the pipe.
3. The kart is a Hartman, so the left header will be close to the seat - this is part of why I need to make the headers myself.
Regarding size, it's my understanding that 1-1/2" o.d. tubing is pretty standard for the tubing of the header itself, and the flex piece is usually 1-1/2" or 1-5/8" i.d. I've heard conflicting opinions about bigger being better vs. 1-1/2" o.d. header tubing being the magic optimum best size. Seems to me the reasonable possibilities are 1-1/2", 1-5/8", and 1-3/4" o.d. tube for the header. Which is best?
In a conventional setup with a header, corrugated flex tube, and pipe, the transitions at both ends of the flex are not optimized for smoothness. I would think maximum smoothness all the way from the cylinder to the beginning of the divergent cone of the pipe would be best. I was thinking of trying to accomplish this by using all the same size rigid tubing with slip fit connections.
I'd appreciate any thoughts you might have on the above.
My 3 main concerns are:
1. Size of the flex connection tubing.
2. Smoothness of the passageway all the way from the cylinder to the pipe.
3. The kart is a Hartman, so the left header will be close to the seat - this is part of why I need to make the headers myself.
Regarding size, it's my understanding that 1-1/2" o.d. tubing is pretty standard for the tubing of the header itself, and the flex piece is usually 1-1/2" or 1-5/8" i.d. I've heard conflicting opinions about bigger being better vs. 1-1/2" o.d. header tubing being the magic optimum best size. Seems to me the reasonable possibilities are 1-1/2", 1-5/8", and 1-3/4" o.d. tube for the header. Which is best?
In a conventional setup with a header, corrugated flex tube, and pipe, the transitions at both ends of the flex are not optimized for smoothness. I would think maximum smoothness all the way from the cylinder to the beginning of the divergent cone of the pipe would be best. I was thinking of trying to accomplish this by using all the same size rigid tubing with slip fit connections.
I'd appreciate any thoughts you might have on the above.